SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PaperChase who wrote (20785)6/21/1998 7:34:00 AM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 94695
 
Paper Chase,,

<<< S&L disaster of the 1980's. <>>>

And Jim's <<S&L debacle>>

Guess it depends which side of the fence you were on.. I'm sure for the right few it was the great S&L windfall of the 80's

russell



To: PaperChase who wrote (20785)6/21/1998 8:29:00 AM
From: Monty Lenard  Respond to of 94695
 
<The SEC has some power and responsibility to see that this doesn't occur>

For a very long time FASD(Financial Accounting Standards) board has been trying to stop the "non reporting" of employee stock options as an expense. Got real close a while back but caught so much heat that they backed off with a POOR compromise.

I agree with James in that the SEC is part of the GROUP.

Here is a good example of the GOOD OLD BOYS at work.

exchange2000.com

Monty



To: PaperChase who wrote (20785)6/21/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: James F. Hopkins  Respond to of 94695
 
It appears the SEC does their job depending on "who" it is,
like they put personalities over principles.

The FTC is just as bad or worse. The fact they are there often gives the small investor a false sence of security.

Even when they are forced to bring the hammer down, most often
it's just a token gesture slapping a few wrist , & collecting a
few fines, ( would you pay a $10K to make 10M ). Well time and
time again you can see something similar in the way the SEC
is administered.
Jim