To: Dave Bissett who wrote (1196 ) 6/21/1998 1:36:00 PM From: Ga Bard Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7039
As a Private Investor: Dave ... you people are nutz... Some of you are going to keep on and end up making statements that may very well be consider slander. There is no way we could have stopped what has happened from happening. There is no way Dan would have got caught had he not told me he was converting some of his restricted "B" to "A" on a Sunday morning, (SUNDAY MORNING) when I got a hold of him pestering him for the accurate MIDLP share count. I immediately started pestering the secretary Mark Pierce the SEC attorney to see if Dan could do that because I did not see where he could BECAUSE I TRUST NO ONE. That led to the discovery of whatever DAN was doing and stop transfers plus lawsuits being put in place. However somethings cannot be verified and we have to hope what the company says is true. Now if you going to pester every single company you going to get into fine knock yourself out ... I do not and shall not accept anyone;'s word but I sure can't say without verification and clarification that something was a lie until I have proof. Well I do not know any statements that were stated on the patents is a lie by Dan Fisher, John Spriggs or Arcon. If you have such proof then please post your proof. Hell, only now have we found out that even MIDL didn't have proof of Arcon's patent rights, but even after one or more posters here clarified that there really wasn't such a thing as "worldwide patents" like Fisher claimed no one started waving red flags, including me. I would highly reccommend you retract this statement until which time you have absolute proof of its intent and its wording but you do what you got to do. If they had a signed contract at time of merger for the world wide rights to DF-144 and royalty contract you will be liable here. If they defaulted on such contracts then that still does not justify your wording here and you are still liable. Think before you start accusing and blaming on what you think to be a fact it is called common sense. The SEC, FBI, and every other agencies do read these threads and yes they have access to all the e-mails through your e-mail server same as mine. You are liable for what you post. Heck even Dan Has affiliates that are copying these post to him probably. USE COMMON SENSE!!! Now what are you trying to figure out. There is no proof to if the world wide patents rights were or were not assigned, contracted or anything to Arcon or Dan or John Spriggs. There is no proof of anything at this point and what you are wanting is not considered public information. You want to play detective you go ahead. Do your thing ... Keep up all this nonsense about the patents cause you are going to regret it if you are making statements of criminal nature and you are are wrong. Knock yourself out with all of this. ONE MORE TIME... Arcon has been rescinded and Dan is being sued for Stock fraud and embezzlement. John Spiggs has resigned and in friendly negoatiation for the building of the DF-144 plant on Maverick engineering table (Hello) and John is presently cleaning some issues on the patents. FOLKS PLEASE USE COMMON SENSE ... As a private investor I try to be responsible and post what I am told but unless it is in writing or black and white it does not exist. That is where the trust comes into play., Now to my knowledge the Press releases are accurate and some were done for a deliberate reason and will be taken care of in the near future. People bought on the press releses NOT this SI board. If you want to hire an attorney to investigate the patent laws and the inside information of the patents go ahead. Me I am going to hope the future holds another corporation with solid assets. This stock fell because of what Dan Fisher has done and with John Spriggs resignation and nothing more. PERIOD. Now I am not an attorney but I really wish you would think before you go spouting off on issues you have no proof to make a basis for the charge. I am not flaming you but Dan Fisher has already called and told ne he is going to sue me for slander. Now if you want threats of slander suits then go ahead keep up this mess. It is always best to deal with the facts instead of going back and retro-acting a slander. Just my personal opinion and not that of MIDL or the Midland board. GB There are forces out there leaking inside unverifiable negative information ... To a certain point you have to believe what the company says and if they lie to you then you have to prove it. I doubt you will ever come up with who, what, when, where and all on the patents. Now if you have the proof of your statements.