SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (13613)6/21/1998 1:19:00 PM
From: PaulM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116781
 
Hi Bobby. I don't know the exact figure, but its overall govt debt is less I susspect as a percentage of GNP (GNP before the recent slowdown that is). What isn't less is the deficits they have incurred in recent years.

It seems to me its your deficits that have the potential to precipitate a short term "crisis" of govt (i..e., like necessitating shutting down the parks service to have money left over for bank bailouts;-)) , whereas overall debt levels are more a constant long term drag on the economy and drain on credit.

"phsychology can chnage the fundamentals"

I think Soros has a similar view. There is no market equilibriam because inverstor perception is contantly changing what equilibraim there might otherwise be. Personally. I never really bought into this.

"if the consumer srarts buying"

Is it rational for them to buy? Would you trade in your money if money were going up in value against everything else (deflation)?

"if the banks start lending again to companies"

Not until they have more to lend. Not until they have more performing loans and fewer losses. The markets way of achieving this is to liquidate lots of bad debt, i.e., to bankrupt many borrowers and lenders (inlcuding banks).



To: Bobby Yellin who wrote (13613)6/21/1998 1:25:00 PM
From: PaulM  Respond to of 116781
 
GM Grinds to a Halt

auto.com

IMO, the Union will not get its way here. GM would like nothing better than to scrap its NA operations in favor of $2 a day labor. Not to mention the continued future progress of automation. Not to mention that the telecommunications revolution implies GM itself is, longer term, in an industry of diminishing importance.