Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elk who wrote (14610)	6/21/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Respond to of 50264

Elk, I agree with you 100%, that when the 30th arrives all will know more about the strength and position of DGIV, alot hopefully will be clearer by then...Now for my safe harbor disclaimer, which BTW, was not present in any of the other press releases and it's prescence in the latest statment is a positive sign that indeed DGIV, is aware and more Focused on compliance with various regs. I own stock in this company and all should do their own research with regards to this company and it's industry and possible pitfalls as well as growth. Prior to this acknowlegement by me, i have strongly advocated BUYING and I will continue to Do so based upon my study of this company and the industry. However, again each must evaluate their position or decision to take a position in this company based upon their own risk/reward tolerance. personally, i will continue to accumulate shares as more cash becomes available. i only have eyes 4 DGIV. r1 PS "timetables" june 30th being one of possibly many more....

To: elk who wrote (14610)	6/21/1998 5:54:00 PM
From: ANALYST10	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Its great that they have started to correct these things but maybe a little bit too late. FYI, the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, were specifically instituted to deal with these specific matters. News Releases that contained forward looking statements or statement of claims that have risks and uncertainties as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 should have been disclosed. Basically, if someone now says they bought the stock on the basis of the information provided by the company can potentially sue the company for not cautioning the reader. Whether the company is ignorant or not unfortunately ignorance is no excuse of the law. As you will find similarly there are problematic areas within this company that will not go unnoticed by the Securities Regulators. Even giving the benefit of the doubt to the company, that they didn't know about this, the financial irregularities, the non-compliance with FASBE guidelines unfortunately is immaterial, the damage has been done. you can't rob a bank and then put the money back and say I am sorry, it doesn't work. Thank you for at least recognizing the purpose of speaking out as opposed to putting our hands over our eyes, ears and mouth. Good luck! I might also add that you should invite the company on a forum basis to answer questions of its investors on this or another message board that would host such a forum. This will also solve the debate instead of the continuous bickering back and forth.