Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tokyo Joe's Cafe / Anything goes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Luke who wrote (26770)	6/21/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: LemonHead	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34592

Glad that is over, you guys had me really going. Some thoughts on PM's FWIW. 1. Don't send a PM that you wouldn't want your mother to see or read. Okay that knocks out some of the thread. If some of mine were posted to the public I would get a beating from my wife. 2. Don't send a PM that you wouldn't personally say to someone's face. Have had folk's cuss me on the phone until I ask them how long they will be in their office cause I coming right over to get it in person. Usually they calm down. 3. No PM's that you don't want made public! Now that's a paradox. Then what is a PM? Private message. 4. No posting of PM's to public domain without public consent of sender in the domain that it is to be read. One must have the blessing of the sender, remember my Wife. 5. If sender gives receiver consent to publish PM, then it must be in it's original state. Any alterations may cause public to interpret under a different light. No spinning. This patented by Clinton. Closing thoughts. In the early days we had phones and party lines, no PM's in that era. There is a reason for privacy. As for trust, when a good person leaves a thread, they don't post were the're headed. Happy Fathers Day, I going home to grill? (Artichoke maybe, but then again some immigrant pulled it from the vine before it could rot). Keith