Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Batman who wrote (927)	6/22/1998 1:04:00 AM
From: Lonnie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Batman: If I put up my bio you wouldn't believe it anyway.I work somewhere in Gov't in Canada, so don't worry about your mom's tax dollars paying for me to post here on work time, that is unless she is Canadian. As for Mr. Shelby and his credentials: I have never said anything about the man other than his engineer said he was impressed with the engine. Show me another post where I did say anything else about him BIG GUY! As for saying the 3 big companies weren't interested I never said that either so go back and get your mom to reread those posts to you and get her to read the name at the top. You won't see my name. Mr. Shelby does know his engines. That can never be denied by anyone. Does AENG have the management to bring the OX2 engine to fruition? That is the real question here Batman. Here are some more questions: Where are the tests? Where is the patent? Why are the insiders selling at low, low prices if this is the engine that is going to change the automobile industry? Why did AENG try to pass themselves off as trading on the Nasdaq? Why did Greg Cummings say the U of W was going to do tests when it was just a demo? Why did LQDPLMMR lie about the shorts threating the University to convince them to cancel the ficticious tests? THERE WERE NO TESTS BEING CONDUCTED. Greg already admitted that he made a mistake when he said tests were being done. You see Batman, the doubt runs both ways, but you shills totally ignore any of these questions and just attack anyone who wants answers. Maybe the engine is the real thing Batman. It is the COMPANY and all you shills that bring doubt to those of us that are posting the negatives. Put the engine entirely in the hands of a man like Carrol Shelby and the engine might one day see the light of day. Keep it in the hands of market makers and stock promoters and this is what you get...a bunch of hype and no substance. In case you care to open that closed mind of yours, you might want to look at the Wankel engine story. It is a good example of an engineer who designed an engine that took 20+ years to get to market.

To: Batman who wrote (927)	6/22/1998 1:20:00 AM
From: Lonnie	Respond to of 3383

Batman: "Will you put your bio. up for us to make a determination if you know anything period?" I have posted over on the TRBDF thread for months now. In case you aren't familiar with that co. it invented a product that is finally EPA approved. It is a product put into vehicles to eliminate the toxic particulates from exhaust fumes. I have been a shareholder in that company for several years while it was still in the testing stage. It took years for them to get the product approved and is now ready to be an OEM product. Some of the BIG GUYS have been testing this product for 2-3 years as it would be foolish of them not to test, retest and then test again. I know as an investor how long this took to get to this stage. The wait is still not over as now we wait for contracts. What will it take to bring an entire engine to the market? One year, five, ten? And do Mr. Bailey and Co. intend to be here for that amount of time or will they just blow off their paper and run? TIME WILL TELL!