Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal Oak-RYO -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike G who wrote (1006)	6/22/1998 9:52:00 AM
From: scott	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1706

i see u still havent't done your homework mike g. u have a computer, there r several sources for factual analysis, yet u fail to do so and offer holders some carrot such as " It seems there are people wanting to play up this negative publicity as much as possible and not release any positive publicity to drive the price of the stock down. When they load up, or have shorted the stock as much as possible, watch it go up." u r obviously a stock promoter using a bag of tricks to paint a picture that the numbers and factual events do not support. come on mike, it is easy. go to www.sedar.com and check out their financials.

To: Mike G who wrote (1006)	6/23/1998 3:16:00 AM
From: Michael Bidder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1706

Mike you sound like a nice enough guy. I just want you to read through the financials before you lose the rest of your investment. Over the course of the next few weeks I will be highlighting Royal Oaks financials to all on this thread. Lets see where this takes us? Responding to you view that: " It seems there are people wanting to play up this negative publicity..." Royal Oak's market capitalization is $122 million US at 7/8! This is a gross distortion of reality. With 70 million in interest payments due to secured lenders and no way to pay this interest it is over for RYO. Even Royal Oaks unrealistically positive projections don't generate this kind of cash. The outcome is a loss of Kemess to the secured note holders. (This is what they want.) The end. Michael Bidder