To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (20131 ) 6/22/1998 3:28:00 PM From: Charles Hughes Respond to of 24154
No, I saw the show when on PBS and it missed all the early part, when it was still a movement (computers for the people, computers for the small business person) and not yet an exploitation. History gets written by the winners, but thanks to the internet it's hard to erase the contributions of the early and relatively unknown completely. Lets really go back to origins for a second: A much better candidate for the 'vision' (god I hate that word now, after it's prostitution by a thousand PR departments) of the personal computer would be the handheld Dynabook idea, developed at Xerox PARC in the 60s, along with the IDE and the mouse. The dynabook ideal has still not been completely achieved. There were lots of other ideas back then too. Science fiction writers had clearly described the desktop, the AI computer, the suitcase computer, the Dynabook, the embedded computer, the 3D computer display, digital radio networking, and the Cyborg by 1960 in various stories. Often these stories were so poorly written that they were just essentially explanations of the technology or science idea and a sketch of some possible consequences. The 'Star Trek' tricorder idea was another kind of hand-held personal computer idea, which we still could not produce if we wanted to, though the cell phone is a pretty good implementation of the original Star Trek communicator - even looks the same. Lots of technology ideas get worked out in their scale and general premise in science fiction first. That catches the general imagination, including all those 10 year old science fiction nerds who go on to make hardware, software, cloning labs, and so on. In a lot of cases I am surprised that these writers didn't go ahead and apply for patents on some of their ideas. A lot more of them would be rich if they had. But science fiction writers get their ideas from somewhere, too. Sometimes they are mathematicians, engineers, or scientists themselves, like Heinlein, Clark, White and so forth. They talk to their friends about their most way out research ideas and hypothesis and then extrapolate. We all get ideas from someone else and then forget where we got them. Mostly I think that MSFT is part of the end-game for the PC. The productization part of the 3 act play, where the money gets made by those who jump in when the ideas are ripe and the stage is set. Innovators? Visionaries? Gimme a break before I gag. Curmudgeonly Yours, Chaz