Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: skreiger who wrote (2814)	6/22/1998 11:48:00 AM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

"Therefore, we should believe all this nonsense about death threats (from the Yahoo message boards) but don't believe someone on the AOL boards?" No one denies that the fake jhild message exists on AOL, it's the authorship that discredited. The threatening messages do exist on Yahoo. And yes, the threats on Yahoo may be from the same type of demented prankster that posted on AOL, but I really wouldn't want to bet my life on it.

To: skreiger who wrote (2814)	6/22/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

You and your band of merry posters determine the veracity of all items posted to SI. That's some kind of power!! Beg pardon? I'm afraid I don't follow. We've given SI information about the threats; they can easily check to confirm that they were indeed posted to us. And they've done so. My suggestion to you was that if you doubt this, you should simply ask them. Therefore, we should believe all this nonsense about death threats (from the Yahoo message boards) but don't believe someone on the AOL boards? Don't forget the PMs here at SI. And this is yet another thing I don't follow: you're saying you believe the "Operation" post from AOL, right? But it was supposedly written by jhild, and you say also that you don't believe anything that we FBNers offer. Ergo, it must be a false statement, no? Think about this very carefully, several times. You can't have it both ways.