Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (10367)	6/22/1998 4:30:00 PM
From: J.S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13594

Sam, I agree that, although its accounting practices have been suspect, AOL has been a successful company and will be around for years to come. However, when the an already richly valued company (AOL) has its stock price more than triple in a year (while the company has grown as expected) one has to be concerned as to whether they will be more and more enslaved to their stock, resorting increasingly to accounting gymnastics. Take Care, Joe

To: Sam who wrote (10367)	6/22/1998 4:31:00 PM
From: Paul W	Respond to of 13594

Good points on both sides. Maybe now we can get back to realistic debate. I never wanted to sling mud...but... this thread had become rife with irresponsible, manipulative posts. Don't ask me for proof, just go back and read the last 200 or so posts for evidence. I want everyone to make $ on the up or the down. RESPONSIBLY As for now momentum is on the up. Fighting this trend is crazy. If you want to short pick a small cap. They constantly go down. Trust me on this one. I'm long on mosty of 'em.

To: Sam who wrote (10367)	6/22/1998 4:48:00 PM
From: Jason Cogan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13594

Sam: <<AOL has been around since the mid 80's, before the internet was even discovered.>> True AOL has been around since the 1980's. Also true that they have yet to earn a penny. Their business model is inherently flawed. It costs them more to provide and support connection service than they are able to earn from access fees and advertising. Meanwhile, the internet progresses at lightning speed towards an open, non-proprietary network, something which directly attacks what limited value AOL has managed to build. But AOL has succeeded at convincing/bribing Wall Street that these facts don't matter. Case and Pittman are masters of perception, marketing hype, and the ways of stock price manipulation (ie. accounting gimmicks, switching exchanges, buddying up to Dick Grazzo of the NYSE, circulating irresponsible takeover rumors). The stock price is built on nothing except hype and misinformation. Most portfolio managers have never used the internet, so to them, AOL represents the information superhighway. Since nobody is really making any money on the net, and everything is based on future earnings, Case and Pittman are free to paint as optimistic a picture that they choose. If this doesn't work, they can always inflate their unaudited subscriber numbers to make their future look brighter still. A question for you. What happens, when Wall Street discovers that making money really is important, and AOL doesn't have a good plan for earning anything? Regards, JC