SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : World Wide Web Casinos (Internet Casino/Sportsbook) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 9:27:00 PM
From: HP  Respond to of 688
 
Here are some interesting exerpts "verbatum" from the Class Action filing against Peter Michaels and related parties in Orange County, CA Superior Court.

Common Factual Allegations

In or around early 1995, defendant MICHAELS and certain of the other Invdividual Defendants formulated a scheme to defraud investors under the guise of creating an on-line internet casino. In the furtherance of this scheme and conspiracy, the defendants incorporated WWWC and BINKY ROO in Nevada on or about August 10, 1995. At about the same time, MICHAELS acquired a shell corporation, ATLANTIC PACIFIC, in the hopes of holding his shares of WWWC common stock in a way that would be "attack-proof" in the event of a shareholder lawsuit.

Unbeknonst to investors, MICHAELS and certain of the other Individual Defendants had been involved in a number of fraudulent real estate schemes during the 1980's and early 1990's. Operating as the San Antonio Land and Cattle Company ("San Antonio"), MICHAELS had defrauded real estate investors in San Bernardino and Riverside counties out of millions of dollars. In connection with at least one action pending at the time funds were raised from plaintiffs and the members of the Class, MICHAELS actually stipulated that he had made "false and misleading misrepresentations of fact" to the entities that financed San Antonio. Noe of this was disclosed.

Since 1995, MICHAELS has asserted an unwholesome degree of control over the business affairs of WWWC and its subsidiaries and affiliates. In addition to charisma, MICHAELS has employed an abusive and intimidating style to exercise such control. At times, MICHAELS has physically assaulted employees and other non grata at the executive offices of WWWC. Defendant MICHAELS is known to carry a loaded gun, which he keeps in his automobile and/or at his desk, which faces three closed-circuit televisions (one with a 50-inch screen) monitoring the entire WWWC corporate offices. MICHAELS has pulled his gun on employees at least once, and, through an agent, allegedly threatened to kill one of the witnesses whose testimony forms the basis for this complaint.

continued....



To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 9:34:00 PM
From: HP  Respond to of 688
 
Due, in part, to WWWC's corrupt management structure, no actual meetings of the board of directors have ever been scheduled or conducted, and most ordinary corporate formalities and procedures have been absolutely disregarded by the defendants.

For example, during the relevant time period, WWWC has never had a regular Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). Indeed, prior to May 1997, the company never had a full-time accountant of any kind, with the exception of a two-month period between January and March 1996. The accounting department, which should have been a critical concern, is not now and never has been a priority. There is currently just one bookeeper perofming accounting functions at the company.

At various times, defendants "hired" CFO's shortly before a private placement was made to investors, in order to represent in the offering materials that the company had a CFO. However, each of these individuals resigned after a few weeks due to frustration and concern regarding MICHAELS' domineering style and an inability to obtain information necessary to the discharge of a CFO's responsibilities. At least one CFO resigned in 1997 because he was concerned that the Securities Exchange Commission ("SEC") and/or the Federal Bureau of Investigation ("FBI") would soon uncover what amounted to a "big scam".

It was always understood by the defenants that a full audit would have to be completed before the stock of WWWC could be publicly traded on a securities exchange. To date, however, two different accounting firms have been unable to complete an audit due, in part, to the shoddy condition of WWWC's financial records, which are very poorly organized and insufficient to support an audit of the company.

WWWC's inability to complete an audit has also been caused by the extent to which mones have been commingled with the funds of other companies, incloding the Corporate Defendants, as well as the lack of documentary support for transactions which have caused funds to flow out of WWWC at "an incredible rate" to pay for some of the defendants' personal expenses.

continued....



To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 9:44:00 PM
From: HP  Respond to of 688
 
Indeed, there is little, if any, differentiation between the vaious companies that operate out of the executive offices of WWWC, and all of them are under the general ownership, control and supervision of defendant MICHAELS and his cohorts. A common receptionist answers two separate telephone lines for WWWC and DIGITAL AGE -- but answers a third telephone line as "corporate offices", receiving calls on that line for BINKY ROO, PJ PROMOTIONS, ATLANTIC PACIFIC and other businesses which defendants do not want callers to "link" to WWWC. During the relevant time period, the employees of "WWWC" received payrol checks from not just WWWC, but also from DIGITAL AGE, BINKY ROO, PJ PROMOTIONS, and ATLANTIC PACIFIC, among others, depending upon which company had any "mones" in its account(s) at a given point in time. Employees were routinely caused to perform work and functions for one or more of these companies.

BINKY ROO, in particular, has no existence separate and apart from WWWC. BINKY ROO allegedly develops and licenses software for WWWC. Under the terms of an agreement entered into on or about August 25, 1995, WWWC paid BINKY ROO an initial license fee of $500,000, as well as substantial additional sums for "royalties," "costs and expenses." In October 1996, WWWC paid BINKY ROO a further license fee of $500,000, under the terms of a "supplemental" agreement which was not supported by any consideration.

Although it was represented to investors that BINKY ROO was "very experienced" in the area of software development, BINKY ROO was formed on the same date as WWWC and had no employees or prior operating history as of August 1995. Indeed, BINKY ROO was formed for the sole purpose of siphoning monies to MICHAELS while continuing to represent falsely to investors that he was "not being paid any money" by WWWC. The software "licensed" by BINKY ROO in August 1995 was either non-existent or, in some cases, nothing more than an adaptation of off-the-shelf software obtained from third parties, many of whom were never paid -- resulting in lawsuits for hundreds of thousands of dollars against WWWC.

Despite having paid millions of dollars to BINKY ROO and having spent millions of additional dollars raised from investors, as of October 1996, WWWC had made virtually no progress in the development of on-line casino games. In order to conceal this lack of progress, the defendants prepared certain software demonstrations which were then shown to investors. However, these demonstrations used slight adaptations of an off-the-shelf software product called "Beat the House."

continued....



To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: HP  Respond to of 688
 
Eventually, WWWC was able to develop and launch the multimedia client-server games software currently in use. The company's "beta version" of its client-server games went "on-line" in approximately November 1997, and the public release took place (and WWWC began to take cash bets) in February 1998. However, the total cost of the entire software development effort including software costs, fully-loaded salaries and overhead -- was less than $2 million. There has been no accounting to plaintiffs and the members of the Class concerning the defendants' use of the other $10-16 million obtained from investors.

Evidently, enormous sums of money have been misues and wasted for the personal benefit of MICHAELS and some of the other defendants. Although the written materials distributed to investors in WWWC indicated that MICHAELS' salary was "deferred," and that he was not receiving any compensation or benefits, these statements were false. In fact, defendant MICHAELS derived substantial monetary benefits from WWWC, including mones sufficient to lease or other wise acquire at least five (5) luxurey automobiles for himself and his family, a large home in Ritz Cove (with monthly paymens in excess of $8000), a second home for his family in Nellie Gail Ranch, and a "scarab" racing boat valued at $125,000 or more and paid for with WWWC corporate funds. During the relevant time period, MICHAELS routinely flew first class and always carried extravagant wads of cash misappropriated from WWWC. He also made frequent gambling trips to Las Vegas, Nevada, and "a lot" of checks were drawn on the accounts of WWWC and its affiliated companies to pay for MICHAELS' gambling debts, drugs, and related personal expenses. MICHAELS' girlfriend -- who lives in Las Vegas and is apparently assisting MICHAELS in funneling monies out of WWWC through a bank account held in her name -- was regularly flown to Orange County for visits with MICHAELS, at company expense. Defendant MICHAELS' personal office is opulently furnished and is larger than most board rooms.

In addition to the foregoing, MICHAELS has caused WWWC to incur substantial obligations for his direct personal benefit. For example, on or about December 27, 1996, plaintiffs SAKAMOTO and NARAHARA were persuaded to lend WWWC the aggregate sum of $125,000, in exchange for WWWC's promissory note and a "personal guarantee" from defendant MICHAELS. Instead of being used to fund WWWC's operations, the borrowed funds were misappropriated by MICHAELS, and, as of March 31, 1998, the obligations were not even reflected on the financial statements of WWWC.

MICHAELS and the other defendants have also caused substantial improper compensation to paid to vaious friends and relatives in situations where no significant value was received by WWWC. Such payments have been made to MICHAELS' brother, Michael Michaels, and to that brother's girlfriend, as wel as to certain of the Individual Defendants, among others.

The defendants' financial improprieties have included numerous related party transactions which improperly benefitted one or more of the defendants at the expense of WWWC and its shareholders. For example, ATLANTIC PACIFIC still owes WWWC more than $124,721.33 for unsecured "loans" allegedly made to that company, and WWWC was caused to provide at least $341,178.09 to PJ PROMOTIONS, a company owned and controlled by defendant MICHAELS. Defendant DOUGLAS-MICHAELS owes WWWC at least $19,457 and the company is owed at least $250,000 in connection with a "note payable" from BINKY ROO.



To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 10:18:00 PM
From: HP  Respond to of 688
 
WWWC has also been used to create "sattelite" scams involving the defendants. For example, in March 1996, the defendants caused WWWC to license its casino gaming software to CAMELOT in exchange for the payment of $10 million, with $1.5 million to be paid within 90 days and $8.5 million to be paid over the next three (3) years. On the strength of the foregoing license, CAMELOT raised nearly $5 million from investors and then used WWWC's software to attract registered players at the rate of 5,000-7,000 gamblers per month, creating substantial income for certain of the Individual Defendants. In April 1997, after paying only about $2 million under the foregoing agreement, CAMELOT was merged into WWWC, presumably extinguishing the software license "liability" and the prospect of any additional "deferred" revenue for WWWC.

Not only have the defendants misappropriated the corporate funds from WWWC, but they have also completely failed to exercise the reasonable and ordinary care which they owed and owe to palintiffs and the members of Class. For example, while squandering the proceeds of funds raised from WWWC investors, the defendants have allowed WWWC's accounts payable to grow to more than $2 million, including unpaid federal payroll taxes of nearly $1 million. Commencing in the fall of 1997, the defendants also stopped paying most of WWWC's employees, resulting in rulings by the California Labor Commissioner awarding hundreds of thousands of dollars against the company for non-payment of wages, penalties and interest. In addition, the defendants have failed to pay a great many of WWWC's vendors for software and related products and services, creating substantial liability and threatenaing the very existance of WWWC.

During the relevant time period, WWWC was caused to waste substantial corporate resoursces on certain boxing promotions for the benefit of PJ PROMOTIONS, a company controlled by defendant MICHAELS. These activities were clearly outside the scope of WWWC's business plan, and only served to aggrandize defendant MICHAELS' ego.

WWWC also wasted nearly $1 million of the proceeds raised from investors on "expanding and improving" the St. James Casino, located in Antigua on facilities leased from the St. James Club Hotel. The spending on this project was recklessly extravagant, in part becuase defendant MICHAELS insited that all of the work crews, materials and equipment be exported from Orange County to Antigua. The investment in the Antigua casino was unwarranted by the meager daily revenu it was able to bring in, and the only business justification for the investment was that the St. James Casino would have made WWWC the only on-line casino with an actual "land" casinoas well. In late 1997, however, WWWC failed to make its monthly rent payments and the lease to the St. James Casino was lost -- along with all of WWWC's improvements.

WWWC also spent substantial sums of money to acquire Red Dot Foods, Inc. ("Red Dot") -- a potato chip company unrelated to WWWC's business plan. Eventually, it was determined that Red Dot was essentially worthless, and the investment was, in effect, abandoned.

As a result of the defendants' wrongful conduct, by the time WWWC went "on-line" in February 1998, it had virtually no funds with which to promote its web site and/or carry out its business plan. Substantially all of the monies raised from investors have been misappropriated and/or dissipated by the defendants. WWWC's current cash position is so dire that the company's telephones were disconnected (for non-payment) for several days in April 1998, and the company's web site was shut down for several days for failure to pay WWWC's server. The defendants have also failed to pay South African vendor for $65,000 in hardware, and that vendor is threatenain to take back its equipment and bring the web site off-line. There are also strong indications that some of the "winners" playing WWWC's internet casino games are not being paid on a consistent basis.

Remarkably, for the quarter ended March 31, 1998, WWWC showed no income whatsoever, along with expenses of $52,831.73. Only a handful of employees are still working at the corporate offices of WWWC, although there are 4-5 persons in a "boiler room" at the back of the offices selling "lottery tickets" for WWEL, dba as the "international Lotto Club." WWEL was supposed to be an on-line pool through which persons could buy a stake in a large number of lottery tickets. Instead of being used in that fashion, the funds that were drawn from clients' credit cards were used to fund WWWC's payroll on a number of occasions.

The defendants' misconduct and mismanagement have caused plaintiffs and the other members of the Class irrparable injury. Despite having raised ample resources from investors, it took WWWC until February 1998 -- more than two and one -half years -- to get "on line" with an internet casino. had WWWC gone on-line immediately, it would have faced virtually no competition. Now, there are more than 130 casinos on-line.

Throughout the Class Period, the true facts about WWWC were concealed from plaintiffs and other members of the Class. For example it was never disclosed that one of the principal reasons WWWC did not go on-line sooner is that MICHAELS insisted the company go "public" before going on-line. In fact, MICHAELS wanted to "cash out" a substantial portion of his stake in the company (held through ATLANTIC PACIFIC) before ever going on-line, believing that it was easier to sell the "sizzle" of a planned casino than an actual operating company with measurable performance and results.

continued....



To: HP who wrote (218)6/22/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: HP  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 688
 
Of course the defendants' own misconduct and mismanagement during the Class Period made it increasingly unlikely that WWWC would ever be in a position to "go public". As a result of the company's poorly maintained and steadily decaying financials, WWWC was twice unable to complete and audit and, without audited financial statements, was unable to go public. Thus, in March 1997, WWWC announced that it had signed a letter of intent to merge with a NASDAQ/OTC company named USA Growth, Inc. ("USAG"), and promised shareholders that the company would go "public" within a few months. In early 1998, however, after repeated delays and almost a year of discussions, USAG pulled out of the proposed merger due to WWWC's inability to present it with audited financial statements.

The mismanagement of WWWC's financial affairs had dramatically affected, and will continue to affect, the business of the company in other respects. For example, on April 2, 1998, Rangestar Telecommunications, Ltd. a Canadian company ("Rangestar"), entered into a software license and operation agreement that would have resulted in the infusion of much-needed capital to WWWC -- $1-$2 million over the next 90-120 days and at least $3-$6 million over the next five years. However, after months of delays, the defendants were unable to provide RANGESTAR with audited financial statemtns, as required. Instead, the defendants demanded a $300,000 cash payment to be made by May 5, 1998 and, when the requested payment was not made, defendants caused WWWC to "rescind" the agreement with RANGESTAR , to WWWC's detriment.

Apparently, the RANGESTAR transaction was also impacted by that company's refusal to agree to defendant MICHAELS' demand that he personally be provided with 3 million or more shares of common stock in RANGESTAR -- surreptitiously and "under the table" -- prior to the completion of any agreement with WWWC.

As alleged hereinabove, during the Class Period, the true facts about WWWC have been concealed from plaintiffs and the other member sof the Class. For example, whereas the vaious written materials distributed to investors in WWWC indicated that the company would realize about 90% of the proceeds raised from investors, net of commissions to broker-dealers ("if any") and offering expenses, in fact, about 30% of the moneys raised from investors have been paid out in commisions to participating broker-dealers such as TRI STAR. A substantial portion of these funds was eventually paid to defendants WOODS, BORETZ and MICHAELS himself.

Not only have the true facts about WWWC been concealed from plaintiffs and the other member sof the Class but, at times, the defendants have fabricated "good news" about WWWC's business prospects in order to deceive investors and pre-condition the market for any potential offering of securities on a public securities exchange. For example, earlier this year, the defendants announced a "$2 million" transaciton between WWWC and "Internet Progressive Gaming, a South African business." However, this was a phantom business arrangement. Internet Progressive Gaming is an entity owned and controlled by defendant MICHAELS, and no money actually changed hands in connection with this purported transaction.

Defendants have been aware that a shareholder lawsuit is forthcoming. Since at least 1997, they have been regularly changing bank accounts utilized by WWWC and its affiliated companies, in order to avoid creditors. These accounts have been changed several times during the past year, pursuant to instructions issued by MICHAELS.

Defendant MICHAELS has also indicated that he is considering various plans which would license the company's casino gaming software to an Australian company and/or to yet another Nevada corporation -- with the objective of "circumventing" WWWC, escaping liability to WWWC's shareholder and/or "transferring" everything out to off-shore companies.

end of allegtions....Causes of action and Affadavits to be entered here tomorrow.... WE ARE NOT GOING TO LET MICHAELS GET AWAY WITH THIS