Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill who wrote (6167)	6/22/1998 10:28:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 26850

"George has presented some evidence for volcanic activity at surface. Do you not find that persuasive? Or is it that you believe the "evidence" can be explained by the venting of kimberlite through the fissure and that a pipe is not necessary for the boulders, the material found in the kimberlite, etc.? From" A pipe is not necessary at all. In fact if the fissure is a vent which we know for a fact since it is a diatreme facies (ie it is volcanic so we know its volcanic) then it does not preclude a pipe but does not point to one either. The volcanoe IS the fissure. We don't need pipes to create volcanic evidence. You have to know a bit about geology of these features here. It is easy for the company to go down blind alleys. There MAY be other features in the area. But there do not HAVE to be, except for the empirical float evidence which raises the POSSIBILITY. ec<:-}