Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (3005)	6/23/1998 12:29:00 AM
From: sandstuff	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

Here, Little Engine, since your name is brought up, perhaps you would like to find out who is at the root of this. Let us know what you find out! The AOL post... Subject: Re: SORRY FOR THE FAKE POST Date: Mon, Jun 22, 1998 22:38 EDT From: JhiId Message-id: <1998062302382900.WAA11600@ladder01.news.aol.com> Well , it has gotten out of hand. Check out Mr. Rizzo's post. That is not the John Rizzo from Silicon Investor. It is really Little Engine who has taken over my job at the FBN impresonating John Rizzo on AOL. It is truly pathetic that this kind of Tom Foolery goes on. As I mentioned, I am no longer associated with Janice Shell and her little shorting clan. The whole thing with Janice started with a company with the symbol CSHK. She invested a great deal of money into a company that produced both Kitty Litter and also had a program that would solve the year 2000 dillemma. Janice bought 500,000 shares of this CSHK at an average price of .54 . Unfortunately, Janice still holds this position and the stock is now trading at .15 . She lost alot of the money her parents gave her to live on. Janice believed that this kitty litter/Y2K software company would be an investing dynamo. Unfortunately, I got to the bottom of this and she turned "sour grapes" against CSHK because she lost money hand over fist. To get back at the investing public, Janice contacted me to spread evil and doom on any stock that has a true, loyal following. We decided to short MTEI and spread cancerous fear and vibes. We even went as far as posting fictious threats against one another. Yesterday, I got a PM on SI from Little Engine. He was very upset at my actions and called me a traitor. He told me that Janice had stripped my SI account and gave it to one of my co-workers to continue impersonating me on SI. So when you see Jhild on SI, its really a guy that was a close friend of mine for the last 8 months. Now Little Engine goes as far as impersonating some poor guy by the name of John Rizzo and makes a fake, tell all post. This is getting out of hand and I will try to stop this absurb, moronic behavior. John Rizzo, I think that you should contact L.E. and end his assault on you. To conclude, let me say that CSHK has left a bad taste in Janice's mouth and her intentions are bad. By the way, I will let you in on a little secret. Most of you think that Janice is a huge, elephant type, mongrol, because she sits in front of a computer all day and lives her life by posting in a fantasy world by the name of SI. Well, half of that is true. She really is not that terrible looking but I hear she caught a bad case of the clap down in Rome. The part about being a anti-social invert is true though. I will keep everyone informed. And once again I am no longer associated with the darkside. If you see someone posting with this name, its not me behind the monitor. It is a clever, knock off of me, spreading evil towards MTEI. Goodluck people as I will keep all informed.

To: Little Engine who wrote (3005)	6/23/1998 12:52:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11684

It has just been pointed out that the number one Hot Topic at SI right now is The Death Threat Thread. I suppose the thanks for that should go to those here who have contributed to its existence by their aggressive attitudes and felonious threats. As has been pointed out before, this is the kind of attention you just can't seem to buy. Those threats may have fallen victim to the Law of Unintended Consequences at this point. Whoever among you without the courage to actually confront the issues, and have chosen instead to threaten the physical safety of the questioner should be proud of your contribution in promoting your stock.