Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13802)	6/23/1998 10:25:00 AM
From: Tom Frederick	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Jerard, Great post. Lots of things to consider there and very powerful potential impact to Naxos IF the ore bodies are similar enough to apply the same technologies. Obviously, as you point out, there must be a specific reason why Mr. Ison was asked to join the team to work on FL and logic would say that there ARE some similarities. Thanks for the research. Tom F.

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13802)	6/23/1998 11:19:00 AM
From: BGM	Respond to of 20681

Jerard: Thanks for your research. Each post like this gives me some additional calm in the wait from one release to the next. I do not feel qualified to know if this process works at FL or not. I did not feel qualified on commenting on the JL process. I do believe that I am qualified to comment when results are tested, duplicated, and economic. At that point I will have plenty of comments (equally not technical). BGM

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13802)	6/23/1998 12:30:00 PM
From: RRG	Respond to of 20681

Jerard: I'd like to add my "attaboy" to the many others you have received for your informative posts. Very refreshing---for a change! Bob Goldstein

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13802)	6/24/1998 2:53:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Why is CIP applicable, Jerard? I've seen no mention of any cyanide-process experimental results for FL, just the usual procession of magic catalysts/processes indigenous to AZ/CA mining ventures ;)

To: Jerry in Omaha who wrote (13802)	6/24/1998 7:57:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Jerard, You wrote, <<I am surprised by the lack of surprise or comment that it may be possible to recover gold from clay at extraction costs among the lowest in the industry and that this recovery technology may have migrated to Naxos with the hiring of Jeremy Ison.>> Does this mean we may all get to set through another recovery process? ;) Has anyone heard of any rumors....err....news along these lines? FWIW the GPGI Pilot Production Run is spelled out in the following post: Message 4997127 Would someone tell me how to vote? Is 11 better than 8? Do we want to fix remuneration or re-negotiate existing stock? I don't understand the ramifications of some of the proposals, not that my votes will change anything. Thanks, WFS