Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rangel Melendez who wrote (3068)	6/23/1998 10:56:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

Well, who's on first? I never said Rizzo apologized to me personally; he didn't. I took the AOL post as a general apology for having engaged in a silly prank. I should have qualified it as "a post purportedly contributed by John Rizzo to AOL". It was emailed to me by a lurker; I'm not an AOL member. My apologies to Rizzo and to the rest of you. So who DID write it? More false identities around here than in Midsummer Night's Dream.

To: Rangel Melendez who wrote (3068)	6/23/1998 11:20:00 AM
From: topstock	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

So this should also apply to the FBN thread and members associated with it. "The reason SI gave for my suspension is as follows "What you did was quite different. You took a fictitious post from another site, pasted its entire contents all over SI, and acted like it was real." 1- fictitious - FBN 2- acted if it was real - FBN So this should be applied to everyone not only John Rizzo. So why are these people also not suspended? TOPSTOCK