Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas Barnes who wrote (1314)	6/23/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Dowgal	Respond to of 7039

Heck Tom, I am asking questions too. Maybe Gary or Wayne can clear up what it means when John Spriggs says he is "making the patent applications".

To: Thomas Barnes who wrote (1314)	6/23/1998 2:13:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

As a Private Investor: I am going to try to explain this again so you are not condused. I thought the application for the patent was already filed by the person that came up with the formula in the first place? That is correct and that is the original inventor in Kentucky. However that is not what John is applying for according to John That's what's been said in the past,was it not? I do not understand this except that at the time of merger Arcon had the rights to the patents of the original inventor. Now whether they did, do , or not I can not verify for I have not seen the audit or the articles of merger Patent was pending?? Patents are not pending until applied for As I understand patent filing procedures once that has been done you have to wait until the application is approved and a number is assigned before the patent legally belongs to the applicant. After that the patent can be assigned to who ever. that is correct. Have I been misinformed?? I do not think so but there appears to be more patents than people are aware GB