To: D. H. B. who wrote (475 ) 6/23/1998 2:53:00 PM From: Dave Gore Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1364
I disagree...the Stock Detective article actually validated many positive things about Rhombic. Compared to many of the articles written by the Stock Detective, even about DGIV, this one is very tame by comparison. You could tell they wanted to really get negative, but were finding it hard to be much more than sarcastic. The Business Week article on AXESSS, with who they are associated, is quite damning. I am really surprised that anyone pays attention the them. I have no question that the Stock Detective is paid to write negative pieces by the MM's of companies whose stock they are short on. We all knwo that 600,000 certs have been called in by the European investors in NUKE over 2.5 weeks ago. The MM's who are short need to cover their huge short position in the next 10 days. They hired the Stock Detective...no question. The articles contain just enough truth and DD to be somewhat believable. They deserve some credit there in being cleverly negative. Even so, as negative as they tried to be....they failed to dimish my enthusiasm for Rhombic. Sure, it called into question Rhombics over exuberant claims here and there, but never denied that their marketing agreements and technologies were real. Even confirmed their association with Daimler. And confirmed that no news was even necessary from Daimler, because the licensing agreement between them and Rhombic is well known. IT had a negative tone as all the STOCK DETECTIVE pieces do, but this one acknowledged licensing agreements and dollars to be received....the best it could do was say that the income to be realized by Rhombic was on the high side. There was no suggestion of scam at all. At under $1.00 with the vast potential here, they actaully made me feel more solid about NUKE than before.