Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : Silicon Investor - Welcome New SI Members! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michelino who wrote (1694)	6/23/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 32883

<<<I understand the context of the original remark. But I doubt if you are following the analogy I made. I see SI as the equivalent to a newspaper...not individual posters.Try telling any newspaper's management that they must publish every letter you write to the editor (because you have freedom of speech.) >>>> Yes you are right I dont follow your analogy someone that writes a letter to the editor doesnt pay for the privilege of posting it My whole point really was that censorship is very difficult to hand out in an even manner no matter who is doing it... So we will see what happens to someone who made a completely inappropriate post about me...compared to other people that I have seen thrown off and suspended for things they have written for others to see ....and I have seen the posts they were thrown off for before they were yanked.....and this ranks right up there... So this will be a case for your even-handed censorship..... Quite frankly, he had the right to say what he did..and I have the right to do something about it and take action based on what he said because he is responsible for his words and actions but since SI practices censorship....lets hope they do it in an even manner