Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dowgal who wrote (1348)	6/23/1998 8:31:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7039

Look I can see it now... Mark makes a clarification then Dan disputes then Mark issues a clarification then Dan disputes. Seems like Dan's point is out and let it happen ... I believe if Dan can get Mark out of the way Dan can lift the stop transfers because Mark is not going to do it. SO let Dan come back and do what he wants to do to clear this mess up. For Dan to have sold stock outside the SEC rules he had to sign a document (which is not public record) as not being an officer. Now with the stop transfers he is protesting the resignation. Oxymoron to me personally Which is it is he an officer which makes the selling os stock illegal or his is not an officer which still makes the issurance and selling of stock illegal. <shaking head> GB <Private investor>

To: Dowgal who wrote (1348)	6/23/1998 8:53:00 PM
From: Kurt N	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

>>Well a simple denial/explaination from Midland would have been nice to see today.<< I think there will be a rebuttal tomorrow (IMO), and there won't be a fisher counter-response. Kurt

To: Dowgal who wrote (1348)	6/23/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: Marshall W.	Respond to of 7039

Dear Dowgal: <<<I feel like we're on the Yellow Brick Road and may never see Kansas again. Looks like the Wizard of Arcon has spoken and no one is answering. I'm waiting for Midland to pull back the curtain on this guy.>>> Trivia: It is said that Frank Baum's (Sp?) OZ, as in the Wizard of Oz, stood for ounce as ounces of gold (troy) and that the story, at least in part, had financial undertones, hence the "yellow brick road". T or F ? Interesting, yes. If I remember correctly he wrote the story during the depression when the government made it illegal for the individual to own gold and when the price of gold was set @ $35 an Oz. Best, Marshall P.S. I did not mean any unkindness in my earlier post, especially to Dan. I often play with words but try not to hurt. I will stand by the fact that we all "need to tune back in tomorrow, same time, same station". Excuse me, don't want to seem strange, I love each of you and "feel your pain" (where have we heard this recently?) but I say it from the heart. Let us united the same way that we would at an old fashioned pot-luck. We could all share a big hug. (Sure we need more but friendship is a great start)

To: Dowgal who wrote (1348)	6/23/1998 8:59:00 PM
From: Marshall W.	Respond to of 7039

Dear Dowgal: <<<I feel like we're on the Yellow Brick Road and may never see Kansas again. Looks like the Wizard of Arcon has spoken and no one is answering. I'm waiting for Midland to pull back the curtain on this guy.>>> Trivia: It is said that Frank Baum's (Sp?) OZ, as in the Wizard of Oz, stood for ounce as ounces of gold (troy) and that the story, at least in part, had financial undertones, hence the "yellow brick road". T or F ? Interesting, yes. If I remember correctly he wrote the story during the depression when the government made it illegal for the individual to own gold and when the price of gold was set @ $35 an Oz. Best, Marshall P.S. I did not mean any unkindness in my earlier post, especially to Dan. I often play with words but try not to hurt. I will stand by the fact that we all "need to tune back in tomorrow, same time, same station". P.S.S. My basic training was at Fort Riley KS, CRTC, 2 WW.