Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 9:51:00 PM
From: Dolfan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

^5s...Patricia

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: Gary Jacobs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

stewed in their own juices...i like it!

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 9:52:00 PM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 50264

Way to go Patricia. Thanks for your Due Diligence efforts. -Scott

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 9:58:00 PM
From: Moosie	Respond to of 50264

Kick some butt Pat. Good for you

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Voices of Reason and Facts will always shed light on a DARK ELEMENT. Thanks, Pat, honey! byron r1

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 10:08:00 PM
From: CWolf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Evening Patricia, I see you've taken the time to respond to our old 'friend' Mr. Biggs... who changed his name to Sludge, er I mean, Coffee Pot. Your response has some great information about our dgiv. Simply put, it's a great post. Whenever someone takes the time to put together all the DD it simply serves to reinforce what we all keep saying, this is a great company with a great future. These people aren't going to cite anything, call anyone, or verify anything because it isn't what they're here for. They're here only to sow the seeds of doubt, but contrary to their agenda, all they seem to be doing is solidifying everyone's resolve. Me, my order's in for tomorrow... Chuck (holding long with lots and lots.....

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: Lazarus Long	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Great job Patricia! The 1:10, I assume was their calculation for the current ratio (backwards by the way)... a measure of the liquidity of the company and ONE thing used to indicate if the company is in for cash flow problems. It is calculated by dividing liabilities by current assets. Analyst10, I'm sure meant to say 10:1. Based on what you just stated I figure that the ratio goes about 1:5 the other way... very liquid... and as a kicker, no long term debt. BTW, with this kind of current ratio, DGIV should have no problem getting a short term loan for the $1m required by the investment A10 was talking about... I can only see about 3 reasons why Ms. Analyst would have different figures: 1) She is a very poor analyst 2) She is not an analyst at all 3) She is very aware of how to calculate this information, but decided to provide a "different outlook" The fact is folks... as Patricia has shown us... Analyst10 has zero credibility. Lazarus

To: Patricia who wrote (15292)	6/23/1998 11:51:00 PM
From: CoffeePot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

Any idea if the notes receivable have been paid, if I remember correctly I heard it mentioned that the Canadian distributor has notes payable to DGIV of approx. $1mm by June 30th, are these just smoke and mirrors contracts???As I'm new to this thread I'd appreciate any info. I also find it disturbing that shares OS increased from 10mm to approx. 18mm in the last 180 days, maybe we found the calprit responsible for the recent decline. Also, how the heck could this company support a market cap above $100mm???? Looks like another PNLK in action. It appears the only $$$$ to be made here is on the short side