Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (29305)	6/24/1998 9:13:00 AM
From: yard_man	Respond to of 132070

There's some big %'s in there. They can't all be seasonal blips.

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (29305)	6/24/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 132070

MMV, That danged Asia and El Nino and The Denver Broncos winning the Super Bowl. <G> MB

To: Cynic 2005 who wrote (29305)	6/24/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: Earlie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 132070

MMV: Good comments. We could also add: - close to a quarter of Q1's GDP rise was a build for inventory. - trade figures, which were imbalanced and ugly last year, that have now dropped into the abyss. - more new lay-offs announced in this last quarter than I have seen in a long time (example, MOT, DEC, etc). - disappointing earnings in Q1 (well below earlier analysts' estimates) - a frightening "pre-announcement" period with respect to Q2 One could go on and on. What happened to Goldilocks? (g) Best, Earlie