Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6315)	6/24/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, I'm confused. What is the ratio of screened ore to head ore?

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6315)	6/24/1998 3:06:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Why not run it and make $7500 a day clear profit for 100 days=750,000 which should allow them to bootstrap quite well to the hundred tona day stage in a year. Patient slow and sure will do it. After all the stuff goes nowhere and their process is efficient so forget the fund raise. Bootstarp and keep it all. Bill

To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (6315)	6/24/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 14226

Ed, this news release is extremely confusing. First what are "Inquarts", it is not in my dictionary, but from prior discussions it must be a special existentialist term describing the doping back of the melt with the precious metals one is trying to get, presumably to seed the melt? I would appreciate an explanation. I take it that a ton is the simple 2000 pounds and that the 18 pounds are already the pellets of copper containing the goodies. Is that a correct interpretation? If that is a correct interpretation than I am quite at a loss understanding the "newtech". Last time, the new precipitation process gave us 1/6 (roughly) of the mass of the head ore or about 350 lbs of precipitates which needs to be smelted with about 300 lbs of copper. (that would be more in line with your reported $232 per ton of head ore of chemicals, the majority of which should be copper. Are you sure about this 18 lbs? Zeev