SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PekingYen who wrote (35215)6/24/1998 7:29:00 PM
From: VALUESPEC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 41046
 
What if FTEL does as RACE has done in the past, especially since FTEL reminds me of RACE (as I've always said) . . .

For those who think this thread is not for everyone, the hypersters, the negative hypersters, the stock owners, and the non-stock owners, perhaps you should e-mail SI and ask them who this thread is for. Actually, it should be obvious; It is for anyone who wants to post thoughts/opinions, or otherwise, about FTEL.

This stock would have to almost triple to be where it was when I first expressed my concerns about this company near the beginning of this year. Wasn't I also chastised for posting on this thread?

. . . six more days to June 30th . . . and still no FNET IPO . . . you know what that means . . .

I do not intend to post on this thread until June 30th or July 1st, just to note the event.

Again, I hope that FTEL makes everyone rich, but based on what I know about the company's past announcements, I don't expect that, but who knows?

FTEL: $ 2.50b

VALUESPEC
valuespec.com



To: PekingYen who wrote (35215)6/24/1998 7:50:00 PM
From: Ray Burke  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 41046
 
PekingYen, the lockup did many good things for PNLK today.

* It showed the officers' commitment to the company's idea, plans,
and future.

* It gave the naysayers (calling the co. pump & dump) a whole
lot less ammo.

* IT HELPED REBUILD INVESTOR CONFIDENCE.

* It attracted much new investment dollars.

* It may have attracted some large investors.

* It reduced the total number of shares in the public float.

* It gave current investors a good reason to acquire more shares.

How many shorts do you think covered today? Also it was the type
of news that caused buying in the stock, rather than buying the rumor
then selling the news. This kind of news it seems encourages buying
because in effect it shows INSIDER BUYING (or holding as it were),
without the officers having to shell out hard cash!

Ray