Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Clarksterh who wrote (20763)	6/24/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Teri Skogerboe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

Clark, I see now where our arguments are getting off track and one is talking apples and the other is talking oranges. By use of the term "shrink", I was referring to a move from some size down to the smaller size of .25, i.e. moving from .50 to .25 or from .35 to .25. When you came up with your example, you started with the assumption (one of many) that Intel was already 100% at .25. Then, what are you shrinking? Also, the basic truth that I was trying to get to was the one Katherine stated, that included the stipulation that it had to be of the same design. That's all...I think we're making too much of this.