Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (15697)	6/24/1998 10:31:00 PM
From: Craig K	Respond to of 50264

It is interesting that WSJ interactive had a positive article about DGIV the same day that SD had their red light special... or did you and all your DD even know about that one..... Craig

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (15697)	6/25/1998 4:07:00 AM
From: Spytrdr	Respond to of 50264

that's why they hire all of you retired obscure cheap accountants, to ensure that happens ___ As far as stockdetective for someone that has no credibility they have been right to the point where if you annualize there positions to the short side there return last year was in the triple digits.

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (15697)	6/25/1998 4:15:00 AM
From: Spytrdr	Respond to of 50264

hey, Anal, so they pay you with AXXS stock, don't they? i love the way you pump it, how's AXXS (OTC BB) doing? - $ 17.65 % today... what happened Anal? 52 week range is $ 0.25 to $ 8.75, closed today at $ 0.44. oh boy, looks like a pump and dump scheme to me! did it hurt? oh by the way, we need to see the facts, the proofs on those accolades from the WSJ, Barrons, etc otherwise it's just another scum ___ Again, they have received accolades from Wall St. Journal, Barrons, L.A. Times, Individual Investor, Forbes, USA Today, San Francisco Chronicle, CNN, CNBC but like you said they have zero credibility? then my question for you, is the Wall St Journal mistaken, is Barron's mistaken. What's wrong with this picture. Let's recap. 1. There portfolio would be up triple digits 2. Applauded by every major financial publication But you say they have no credibility. Hmmm let's see. Well that's a tough one. By the way, their web site comes out with recommendations also, but theydon't get paid for them and the proof and results of their research is there for all to view.