Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wonk who wrote (3562)	6/24/1998 11:58:00 PM
From: Turboe	Respond to of 11684

Well, Gort wrote that PR so who cares...

To: wonk who wrote (3562)	6/25/1998 12:20:00 AM
From: macker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

i own a business worth over 3 million dollars and have set up, as a consultant over 23 clinics in 17 states, so i would say that i have qualifications in business, since the age of 24 too. i have a network of doctors over 150 strong across the usa that take my advice on business building past and present, thats worth something as well. so dont assume what you dont know, kinda like the millionaire in new york that lives half the year as a vegabond, just to see who will truly treat him kindly and then he makes them rich, not made up, this story has been in many newspapers. you are not dealing with a weak handed, i get scared, what should i do investor. to clarify, the usgs numbers verify a 2.85 book value as listed in their release, i have also called the usgs to verify the numbers that they have reported as being truth, they also stressed that their numbers are notoriously way low due to liability issues. if you take industry standards, plus what i have been told by people i know in the business, the numbers are correct, whether the bb world agrees doesnt matter to me, what matters to me is that i can confirm my beliefs through a reliable source that allows me to disregard bb games, which by the way have nothing to do with company fundamentals usually, ask analyst 10 he will tell you the same thing, but rather taking a long term approach that if the company gets to nasdaq, not just based on their own price-there are other ways, and i know you know this, nice word twisting on your part, the stock will be properly priced when it gets there and it is well worth the gamble at these prices. if you think that bb's are anymore than legalized gambling then i really want you to talk to analyst 10. macker ps. as for microsoft, have you ever been called the master of the obvious? come on, make a pick not a "i guess if i have to recommend a stock, i choose microsoft based on fundamentals", make a pick that will bring wild gains, a bb stock. just for fun, you like fun dont you?