Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : James Cramer Skeptic Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (332)	6/25/1998 6:15:00 AM
From: James J. Cramer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

I dont give a ^%##^& about sexual preference; never have; never will jjc

To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (332)	6/25/1998 8:34:00 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1254

James J. Cramer: Can you believe this guys questions? And, he is 48 years old and a lawyer! Sorry, I said I would not post this thread again, but so did you! Regards, LG PS: The problem with the markets now days "punk traders". With the advent of computer trading for the masses, info "such as yours" via the internet (much of it free), the MM's can have a field day with these guys! Throw out conventional investment wisdom. Hype will get these guys to invest in anything, look at PE's of AMZN, AOL. Sadly, I don't think even a crash will teach the lesson! Maybe a two by four!

To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (332)	6/25/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Respond to of 1254

Should a writer inform his audience as to the role his sexual preference plays in what he prints? For example, if someone is gay, and his sources have been developed because the writer is gay, should he let his audience know the circumstances of his sources? I stand in awe!! o¨o '''''''' A little boy with big words, asking about sexual preferences, and to boot, in relationship to investment decisions. Not that I give a damned, but this is got to be the greatest moronic approach indeed! In fact go see: #reply-5016511 And have at it with gusto, you deserve it, a pompous arse of the first order! calling others under IQ'd. Based on that, indeed you must be from another planet, or perhaps a distant cousin of the Ayatolah Arsahola It must be that thingy, "the Internet" that surely has opened up the window of the Circus of the Absurd yet again, for these self appointed "smart boyz" post their grotesque rubbish. Lucrecia!! you left the door opened again! the derelicts are escaping..... oh nooooo!! Next we will have a new investment indicator, the Sexual Preference Directional Angle... with its variant the Viagra Moving Average. Great !! Then the Sex Stock Index, oh boy! what a thrill..... Talk about "Inflection Points"! Perhaps you should pay closer attention to the "Genuflexion Position Entry Point", surely your investment performance will be incremented by its ability to "show you a good time". Perhaps you should consider applying for a position as bishop in the church of your choice and then go check the sexual preferences of your flock. Who knows! you may find what you are looking for sailor boy!! Wheeeeuuuuu.... what a moron! And a lawyer with big words to boot! Objection your honor! wordy, irrelevant and idiotic. Sustained!! get the Moron out of the thread..... Oh, and by the way, do not bother responding to me, as I am far too busy with important things such as the World Cup, just now I had to kill some time "between games", and your Moron Nomination came in handy... Who cares, there is always the proverbial "Next" button... click!

To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (332)	6/25/1998 5:09:00 PM
From: butter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1254

Jock, I'm dumbfounded but since I have a IQ of a rat's a** and do not live in your investing world that probably explains my dumbfoundedness. Listen smart sex boy, what is your criteria for buy, sell and hold. Does a woody mean you buy? If you go limp do you sell? If you use Viagra does that mean manipulation? Just curious. butter