Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wonk who wrote (3587)	6/25/1998 1:01:00 AM
From: macker	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11684

my business name is on my profile genius, you said you read it earlier, did you conveniently skip that part of what!! i woudl expect a man who thinks he is a legend in his own time could dd that one with one phone call, im not hiding. can you come up with a source more reliable than the usgs that will refute, the word you used, what the usgs is reporting, hate to think our tax dollars could of been better spent by hiring you than by supporting a nationally recognized agency. if so back it up with audited survey facts from this organization that have been submitted as documents that bring to light that the usgs is a fraud or at the very best highly irrespected for their knowledge. as for throwing up, i hope your morning sickness goes away soon, hate for you to wake up in the spew youve been throwing out here, you will see that you really dont smell so good. SEE YA, ITS MIDNIGHT AND MY LAST OFFICIAL POST ON SI, until it cleans up anyway, theres lice vomit all over. see the rest of ya at rb and in pm, e-mail only. macker

To: wonk who wrote (3587)	6/25/1998 11:05:00 AM
From: eric deaver	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

ww, It occurs to me that your arguments on stock valuation (which, BTW WE HAVE HEARD AD NAUSEUM) are misplaced at the current stock price. If the stock was currently valued at $2.85 solely based on the claimed coal reserves I might say you have a point and thank you for pointing this out (might even consider the stock OVER VALUED and sell). That is NOT the case in case you haven't noticed. I have laid out my arguments several times on why I think this stock has a good chance of soon being FAIRLY valued at prices much higher than current prices. This is based on my current understanding of the property locations (i.e., at least on the county level), the plans of the company (as far as we know them now), the credentials (and discussions w/) management, my feelings for the kinds of coal, oil, natural gas AND coal-bed methane reserves that in all PROBABILITY are under these properties, the pending Stagg reserve studies (and probably other acquisition type PRs), in addition to your well thought out valuation for the claimed coal reserves (yes, I think we indicated you gave us something to think about - feel better now). But as has been pointed out to you this is not Microsoft. The payoff is a great deal more than 20% / year. I think we all understand the risk and are willing to take it at this point. Eric