Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (9575)	6/25/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18444

No need to bash, Aleta. That's a reasonable question. Here are the possibilities: 1) It's possible that the PR firm could have quit. 2) It's possible they could have been fired. 3) It's possible that they may have mutually agreed to sever the relationship. But only one scenario fits the facts of what's happening: New merger transition team leader (James Green); Both ESVS and Zulu, functioning as one company, now firmly on the West Coast; Hayton (East Coast) is in a dinimished or non-existent role; time zone difference; and given big events on the horizon, the need to communicate instantly with PR/IR department. Plus, this could also be an example of the continued growth of the company. But once again, we don't know. Thus, it is plausible for you to present the scenario that they may have quit. I suspect, given the reality, that the termination was mutual. I also, again, take note that the firm came in during the Lair period. We are, today, firmly entrenched in the Mincheff/Green period of Zulu's growth.