Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: don ryndak who wrote (29359)	6/25/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

I know you didn't ask for my advice, but I'll give you some of my random thoughts anyway. FWIW. If I'm not close to the money and it is coming close the month's expiration before -- that is a good time, I think. If the position is the result of rolling down a successful play I leave it on a little longer perhaps. Any time I have rolled out -- it would always have been better for me, when things were not moving my way, to sell and then wait a "few more days" before buying the next expiration. I think on MU and semi's there is a change of sentiment going on. Sell and give yourself a few more days.

To: don ryndak who wrote (29359)	6/26/1998 10:26:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 132070

Don, the 25 strikes are back in the money as I write this. The dead cat bounce at MU, and for all the techs, for that matter, is probably close to being over. There is no general rule of thumb. All I can tell you is what I do based upon my system. Remember, I use 90/10 and thirds to enter and exit, so I am taking much less risk than many options players. When I put on a put or a call, I am shooting for a quadruple. However, time can dull that goal. Once the puts enter into less than one month to expiration, if they are out of the money, I let them run and only replace them after expiration. If they are in the money, I often settle for much less than a quadruple. I will roll out in time and sometimes up or down in strike price simply because a few weeks may not give me enough time to see fundamentals take hold. With my system, you get a large number of total losers. You also get much fewer but still, a painful number of puts that are doubles or even triples, and then fade away to break even or worse before they become quadruples. However, the quadruples and better winners more than make up for them over time. I have found my put and call buying to be extremely streaky. I get years like 1991 and 1996 where I am printing money. I also get years like late 1997, first half 1998 where the quadruples are hard to come by. I realize that not everyone can use this system, but it is the only one that works for me on the long option side. If I take smaller profits, the total losers and the kiss your sister "winners" end up eating my lunch over time. Hope this helps. MB