Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dragonfly who wrote (616)	6/25/1998 9:00:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 880

The waivers granted under Reagan and Bush are different for a number of reasons which have previously been posted on this thread, most notably the move from State and Defense to Commerce. As for the connection with donations, as has been posted ad nauseum your FEC post is irrelevant. The issue is whether higher ups at the companies donated to Clinton or the DNC as did Mr. Schwartz. it has nothing to do with PACS which is the data you supplied. You have stated the launches are not connected with donations but you have not proved that executive personnel at Hughes, etc. did not give donations. It was your statement and you ought to be able to back it up. Obviously you can't. You should take your own advice. Put up or shut up. JLA