Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (9610)	6/25/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Jon Tara	Respond to of 18444

So, how long WAS Lair there, then? Why are you unable or unwilling to quote a specific figure? If you know, why don't you just say so? Why make this a mystery? I'll gladly concede if you can quote a specific length of time, and your sources for the beginning and ending dates. In quoting 20 days, I used the best information I had available. And I did specify my sources. That may have been incorrect, but it was based on the best information the company was willing to give us at the time. Wouldn't it be great if, in the future, this company would clearly announce it's major personnel changes, rather than just "name-dropping" them in a press release about something else?

To: PartyTime who wrote (9610)	6/26/1998 1:10:00 AM
From: BlueFox	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

BlueFox, I'm in a hurry and am skip reading. But what you said below stands out. And it's a perfect example why you don't take Jon Tara's word. That response is a perfect example of steering the discussion away from the point of a question to a trivial non-issue. Lair could have stayed there for 20 days, or 2000 days, it doesn't change the point: if he was there to get the company going in the right direction (this thread was raving about it) why undo his work now? BF