Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : LGTK: A quality long term penny -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steven G. Trapp & Company who wrote (48)	6/25/1998 10:10:00 PM
From: PitBull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 125

+Steven G. Trapp & Company, first you post "hey herb, how about it?" and not even to him but to someone else second, you are very impatient, Mr. Fischer doesn't hang around all day waiting to answer SI questions on your schedule third. your agenda here has been clear, to ask subtle antagonizing questions, with negative motives It is very distasteful what you are doing. It is an honor to even have Mr. Fischer here. I am starting to think you are an MM you made your agenda clear to anyone with a brain And anyone invested in LGTK DOES have a brain to realize the solid, undervalued and undiscovered company it is. On your profile you list "speed" as your hobby, does that mean drugs?

To: Steven G. Trapp & Company who wrote (48)	6/25/1998 10:15:00 PM
From: Jim Reome	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 125

I would not expect Mr. Fischer to be sitting around at 10 oclock at nite to respond immediately to your foolishness. I also believe you have a negative agenda and would hope that Mr. Fischer does realize that their are investors following this thread that appreciate his responses to their questions. I would not think that a response is necessary to you. Hey Herb. Shows lots of class.

To: Steven G. Trapp & Company who wrote (48)	6/26/1998 1:19:00 AM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 125

Everyone's already said what I was going to say, except: How you ask a question is as important as what's in it. I have no objection to criticism, to questions they might be construed as "negative", or comments which might bring limiting factors into view. No stock is perfect, all companies have advantages and disadvantages, and all such discussion is legitimate. But adopting a style that's unnecessarily harsh, even to the point of rudeness, is pointless and in poor taste. This is the first time I've seen a Company President personally answering questions on a message board, and I have to say the answers have in every case been clear, concise, and entirely credible. I think we should be treating Mr. Fischer with at least the same degree of respect we'd give anyone else on the thread. If someone asked me a question, and someone else jumped on with "hey, how about it" 20 minutes later, I'd be seriously tempted either to walk away from the thread or flame the guy a good one. And we don't want either of those to happen. I'd like to think I have a pretty clear overview of the positives and the negatives on this stock, and on balance I think it's an excellent investment. I'm willing to discuss this opinion - in civil fashion - with anyone, including those who disagree with me. But let's do it with a little common courtesy, no? Steve