SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (137)6/26/1998 7:36:00 PM
From: KM  Respond to of 10072
 
Is he permanently kicked off? I hope so because that is one of the most offensive things I've ever read. I've made my complaints.



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (137)6/26/1998 7:39:00 PM
From: Rocky Reid  Respond to of 10072
 
Nice try, Jock. But no dice. Investing in dogwater stocks like IOM should not be cause for frustration characterized by lashing out in vain attempts in trying to get me kicked out.

Numerous people have tried before. They were the ones who ended up getting kicked off. Since I have never violated any rules, there is no cause for concern. I will be here for a long, long time, revealing THE TRUTH about Iomega, rest assured.



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (137)6/26/1998 8:38:00 PM
From: Brendan2012  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
I certainly don't think Rocky's post is worthy of kicking him off. I don't think SI needs to censor that kind of thing. You should give up your personal vendetta against Rocky.

Brendan



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (137)6/26/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: adolf  Respond to of 10072
 
Good idea to start this thread. The thought of exclusion drove a certain maggot to new lows. and to throw a little gas on the fire, the psycho has a sidekick. Ignore them and provoke a command performance.It's a form of dark humor.SI mgt won't tolerate much more.Now remember,no response is the best response.