SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PKGP (Packaging Plus) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: blash who wrote (4265)6/26/1998 9:20:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4783
 
blash, would you please post the url to that post?



To: blash who wrote (4265)6/26/1998 10:11:00 PM
From: betty blank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4783
 
I cant imagine that no one has said anything about ICC not representing PKGP any more. I just found out today, I spoke with John and Barry at ICC and they wouldnt comment on anything. What is going on here? Is everyone getting smoked here. Why would ICC all of a sudden stop dealing with PKGP? Why doesnt anyone else know or care of the situation? I find it disturbing! ANY BODY OUT THERE: I AND ALL WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WITH THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



To: blash who wrote (4265)6/26/1998 11:47:00 PM
From: Debra&Jeff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4783
 
Well I have read the "Raging Bull" post (by the way I am a member) and have no concept as to your interpretation of the post. From what I read they only stated they deal with fundamentals of a company and in NO WAY are concerned with the trading price of a stock.

As far as I can tell, from this post, ICC is still on board. Their position has not seemed to have changed at all. I suggest that you re-read this post and reconsider your interpretation.

Of all the thread I belong to, I believe the most relevant information is posted on SI. The majority of the other threads tend to "pump and dump" stocks based on the poster's current position. Don't get me wrong I have found some extremely relevant information on all the existing threads. This only serves to enhance my DD efforts and form a more well balanced position regarding a company's status.

After re-reading this Yahoo post you would like to discuss the subject further, please feel free to respond.

Jeff



To: blash who wrote (4265)6/27/1998 3:37:00 AM
From: wlcnyc  Respond to of 4783
 
"...a rather irritated comment was made by ICC to the PKGP investment community in post #206."

Perhaps it makes no difference because of subsequent posts, but the same post contained in #206 on Raging Bull, from ICC, was also made on this thread.

techstocks.com

Bill