Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : GameTech Int'l. GMTC < SATELLITE Bingo and more > -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tgs59 who wrote (339)	6/27/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Shaquapa	Respond to of 400

OFF TOPIC: Going on a cruise for a week. Just in the nick of time too ... was starting to get burned out. Nothing like sitting around all day on a luxury liner having people fetch you drinks! <G> Good job on the new location. That should increase the daily volume from 14 shares to at least 15 LOL!!!!!! C-ya in a week!

To: tgs59 who wrote (339)	6/27/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: sigmass	Respond to of 400

Glad you and your follower SHAQ have emerged at long last. It does not seem possible that neither one of you do not see an opportunity to demonstrate to every one how the negatives I have and will continue to bring to your attention are unfounded , not misleading and ---ing. Furthermore you almost with out exception have put forth a analytical presentatioin about your many and varied measuresments that endorse your recommendations as to your and GMTC's glorious future Forgive me if I take a very intense exception to what you say and the purpose for which it is said. Mind you this reaction is not based on an across the board reaction to all the postings you (and SHAQ) have made but rather only to those related to certain specific topics which for the most part have been previously adressed.( New Ones are waiting in the wings as well). Your decision to pass off these critical matters as a waste of time (re discussing them with me out in the open absolutely convinces me that My analysis must be hitting close to home otherwise there is no way you would suddenly do a 180 degree turn and run for cover. An example of this will follw on my nxxt post