To: Stitch who wrote (4895 ) 6/28/1998 6:57:00 AM From: Bosco Respond to of 9980
g'day all - dear Stitch, I certainly agree that the proliferation of ideas is a good thing, in case I ve given the wrong impression in the prior post. However, to stray off topic a bit to further clarify my point, your citing of Heidegger bearing the full weight of western civilization, ranging from the pre-socratic greeks to the 2 fathers of existentialism, is precisely my point how even the great beings can get caught up in the moment [and movement] of passion. Instead of focusing on a single moment of discretion, Heidegger is indeed a Great Man [or should I say "Ubermensch," <vbg>] who has come to realize the mistake and to turn his back on the seduction of rectorship. Millions were willing to march into hell because they were promised a condominum in heaven. IMHO, to borrow from the late Eric Hoffer, the net, as a human leviathan personified [to me,] is capable of infinite plasticity of good and evil. However, it inhabits a parallel universe. Net or not net, millions has the [erroneous] beliefs that they are superior to the indigenous people or people of differences. Tiananmen, Jasper, Kosovo etc these require more than the bombardment of information. More than a decade ago, I ran into this kid who got a scholarship to study at a famous university. However, this kid came from one of the poorest county in Maine. What's more, the high school whence he came, only equiped with the bare necessities of education, sans computers and other modern facilities, has produced more "gifted students," relatively and absolutely, than any other in the US. My point? A person's character transcends technologies [which I'd think everyone here agrees.] To bring this to back to the topic, while I don't think one should rush to judgement, Clark certainly has a point in his concerns pertaining to the generation of "little emperors" raised in China at the present time. Who knows, maybe instense self-centeredness is precisely the antidote for a nation of sheep [incidentally, to digress, while maybe it is not a popular view, I don't think the tiananmen incident in 89 is a spontaneous uprising.] Enough ramblings <G> best, Bosco