Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cliff Daniel who wrote (4017)	6/28/1998 1:57:00 AM
From: Patricia Trinchero	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

OT just testing. Can't post on another thread, so I'm just seeing if this works.

To: Cliff Daniel who wrote (4017)	6/28/1998 3:00:00 AM
From: Kurt_Ruckus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11684

Wow, am I actually seeing honest to goodness discussion here? It's so nice to see people posting why they see MTEI as risky as well as counter postings without name calling (that I noticed, didn't read every post tonight). Thanks to you all. G'night. Kurt (going out to see Swervedriver)

To: Cliff Daniel who wrote (4017)	6/28/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11684

It is interesting isn't it with the number of symbol changes that this company has had that they just never have seemed to get any filings into Edgar. Maybe I've missed them, but I have yet to find anything on SMRY/LUMA/RICI/ICVI/MTEI. Rushing to file Edgar documents is not a long tradition with this corporate entity. You know any of this information can be voluntarily filed. Disclosure of stock ownership, is not a big deal. After all if they can send me the list if I write, I'll just bet they could send that to the SEC as well. So why don't they? Or is the real question Why won't they? Or has John Christensen established a tradition of SEC filing avoidance that Jack Uselton is choosing to continue?