Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mama Bear who wrote (1286)	6/28/1998 10:59:00 PM
From: Ken Salaets	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4634

Barbara, what other conclusion can someone draw? The freak who wears pink shows up on Tava. Shortly thereafter, you, Don, Bill et al. arrive. Coincidence? A fanatic? Nah. Obsession with pink? Nope. A detester (sp?) of B.S. and those who use anonymity to try to deceive others so they can separate them from their money? Bingo! It all smacks of the same routine used on the elderly, one of the favorite targets of scam artists. Are we to assume that they deserve what they get solely because they get duped? Should those who invest in Tava and get duped by your colleagues be afforded any less sympathy? Or help? I was in Tava before Skipard. Does that mean he followed me? Re my lemmings comment, please refer to the first paragraph. Nevertheless, you protest so fervently that you have convinced me that you don't fit into that category. I stand corrected in your case, but your sudden appearance on the Tava thread still smells fishy. Mind explaining that? I am not arrogant re someone's contrary interpretation of "facts," but rather their misrepresentation of mere OPINION as fact. There's a world of difference. The quote was from one of Bill's posts. You asked why I am so determined to expose him. I should have labeled it accordingly. I apologize. You asked, in so many words, why I get so pissed off at him, and I used that particular deception of his as one of many examples of his handiwork. Barb, you can repeat this "insecure" nonsense until the next millenium (2001, by the way), but that won't make it true. It's not. I'm anti-B.S., and so long as people insist on spreading it about issues as serious as the Year 2000 glitch, I will probably be close behind. K