Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (6447)	6/28/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard, my X-ray analysis of the ore did not show ant significant (more than about 30 PPM of either selenium or arsenic. I think it is a non problem. Zeev

To: Richard Mazzarella who wrote (6447)	6/28/1998 8:33:00 PM
From: Jeff Williams	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 14226

Richard: I sure don't mind any one asking questions, That's the purpose of these threads after all, to share information with individual investors. I do take exception however to calling out the environmental "dogs" before you know the answer as to whether there is a problem, or not. At worst, it lends credence to the "dark forces" conspiracy theory, at best it is self-serving, and irrational. The Dept. of Mines (US, I believe) visits all mines twice yearly after all, according to what I have been told. If there was a problem, you'd think they would have caught it by now. As to permitting, GPGI does not yet have a furnace permit, which they do not need until they are in production. They do have water and mill permits. Once they have established production and have a consistent process the regulators will measure air quality and issue a permit, or require them to take anti-pollution measures. Regards to all -- Jeff