SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The 2nd Amendment-- The Facts........ -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PAT JENNING who wrote (58)6/28/1998 5:51:00 PM
From: marcos  Respond to of 10167
 
Amazing conception of freedom, isn't it? - the right to be blown away on the highway because some idiot who figures he owns the lane you're in can legally pack a gun.

The mexicano way is simply to have a bigger truck.



To: PAT JENNING who wrote (58)6/28/1998 6:05:00 PM
From: Turboe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10167
 
I do not think that assault weapons should be illegal. The true meaning of the 2nd is for protection against tyranny from our government.

Up until the 1900's private individuals owned battleships and cannon.

I know someone who legally owns tanks and anti-aircraft guns.

Nuclear weapons-- yes they should be illegal!

I meant no offense in my previous post-- sorry!



HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News