Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (6970)	6/29/1998 2:02:00 PM
From: Jon Matz	Respond to of 34075

<<this thread is obviously for those who are convinced and not a place where my kind of approach is welcome and that is fine.>> Tom, please don't go! You've said nothing that I don't accept as logical and prudent. My posts and those of many others are based on enthusiastic expectation. It's great to have you here, especially since it takes some of the heat off Claude. We need critical examination of all aspects of our situation, but it's not likely that you will find a lot of praise here for doing so. But in the scope of the whole story, your imput could prove quite valuable. I for one respect your approach and look forward to your posts, please don't leave. Cheers, Jon

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (6970)	6/29/1998 4:21:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Stick around Tom. I think most of us appreciate any and all intelligent views, especially when backed up by any sort of proof and or/logic. The only little problem I have with your last post is the part about hoping the SEC is happy with GE's explanations. As far as I can tell from speaking with SEC and GE, the SEC has not asked GE, at least not formally, and especially not publicly, to explain anything. Regards, Jim