To: EyeDrMike who wrote (19732 ) 6/29/1998 9:38:00 PM From: eleebee Respond to of 31646
To all, I taped the interview and timed the question and answere periods. The interview lasted 31/2 minutes starting with a short commentary by Bill G. and consisted of 3 questions 1: Why do you have so many day traders? Question and answere took approx. 1 min. 2: What happens after y2k? Answer by J.J. (I'll paraphrase) We have a core business that is national, becoming intrnational, expanding client base among fortune 500 companies. New y2k business has ex- panded our core business and non-2yk business significantly time 1-1/2 min. 3:will there be a slowdown in our economy? question and anwere 1 min. then thank and goodby. This was not an essay test Jenkins had to respond to the questions posed, and was not given a chance to elaborate. In the 1-1/2 min. truly allotted to Mr. Jenkins I feel he came off very well. I know the usual shorts are expert in reading body language so draw your own conclusions as to their motives. In my opinion I feel that he was frustrated by the questions asked and the little time devoted to the company. Those that say he could have elaborated more, smiled more when such inane questions were asked are wrong. I have been on the thread for many months and it has been the concensus that management was and is excellant. John Rakoci never complained abour management, maybe about p.r. since he was too busy telling us how much money he was making by day trading this predictable stock. This is a niche company with excllant clients, it is not a scam, We expected too much too soon. Patience is the key word. Short selling is not a dirty word. Their are ethical shot sellers and those we see on this thread. To constantly flaunt the same garbage is unnecessary and spiteful done by small people with small minds. Being clever doesn't mean smart. Sorry to ramble on but I am upset by those that fall for the crap dished out by the wexlers,pinks,calcs and their minnions Excuse the misspelled words I to tiered to edit.