To: Jeffrey L. Henken who wrote (19 ) 6/29/1998 8:51:00 PM From: R.C.L. Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120
Lesson from OZON Hi Jeff-Let me first say that if anyone ever had a doubt about who you are or what your motive's are they can now see for themselves what a generous, knowledgeable person you are. The insights you give into doing superior DD are invaluable, as I have found out in past dealings with you. Whoever stumbles onto this thread will probably go away with much more knowledge than they arrived with. Now to HABE--When I first looked into HABE, I could not help but think of OZON.Like you say, A decidedly superior technology both environmrntally, cost wise, and more efficient and precise than anything else out there. But as we well know chemical lobbies and local & gov't politics are hard to overcome. Like OZON, if initial hurdles can be overcome and a first big contract comes in, we are basically home free. I feel the recent acceptance of EMP has only come now after years of research, because the basic science of his separation technique was considered impossible by the scientific community and as such patents could not be obtained. After a 16 year review by their patent experts, the Dutch issued Haber a patent for the process in 1992 in Holland. Since then acceptance has been mounting, culminating with the COLOrCHEM 98 international conferencehaberscience.com ,held in May. Will the recent acceptance open doors to the industry? Will recent financial alliance, biz.yahoo.com help with burn rate? Will their Gold separation process ever overcome the chem lobby? I don't know the answer to any of these questions. It's a dime stock with lots of possibilities. What can I say? To me, it's worth a shot. Regards Jeff--have a great mini-vacation and good luck to all!! Bob Lembo