SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Fox who wrote (59096)6/29/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: Francis Chow  Respond to of 186894
 
Acer's IBM deal to promote XCs:
news.com

Intel unveils server chip which may buoy its earnings:
techserver.com

Mergers up 30%:
wired.com

Intel plows ahead:
news.com

Intel cuts mobile chip prices:
news.com

Motorola makes biochips:
news.com

Intel debuts Xeon:
infoworld.com

Exit Pentium Pro, enter Xeon:
techweb.com

Rockwell to cut 3,800 semiconductor jobs in restructuring:
dailynews.yahoo.com

Computer chip maker LSI Logic to buy Symbios:
dailynews.yahoo.com



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (59096)6/29/1998 8:16:00 PM
From: StockMan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff,
Re -- It has to do with Intel's key strategy - to do what is necessary to build out the information infrastucture - bringing resources to bear on the crucial bottlenecks.

Intel would need to "broaden" its strategy. In addition to enabling the information infrastructure, it also needs to participate in growth areas within this infrastructure.

My guess is Intel is attempting (very slowly but surely) to capture the SOHO/home area of networking (components that belong in the PC -- modems (software, cable and DSL) and NIC's.

One other area that Intel is "attempting" to expand in is automated services.

Intel also has had very little luck in anything other than CPU's and related components. Thus they seem to be less than 100% committed to these areas.

Stockman



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (59096)6/29/1998 8:54:00 PM
From: Jay  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff Re "bringing resources to bear on the crucial bottlenecks"

My 2c worth - removing bottlenecks is not going to be
sufficient to change the CPU demand problem.

FWIW I think software (i.e. content) is going to
become much more important than hardware.

Think about a VCR. I don't know if this is a good model,
but it is possible (indeed likely if things stay the way they
are now) that what happened to
VCRs will happen to mass-market computers.

Just MHO