Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Riley G who wrote (4113)	6/29/1998 8:09:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6528

To: Riley G From: s martin Monday, Jun 29 1998 8:02PM EST -Preview- To: Riley G From: s martin Monday, Jun 29 1998 8:01PM EST -Preview- >.Well if a certain person or persons are the ones complaining then they would know what was said in a complaint and have inside knowledge of want would be wanted. And if a BROKER who is claimed to be a VP, then he/she should be able to slant their complaints that direction. << Huh ???????? I'm afraid I don't have a clue what this means... can you clarify what the heck you're trying to say here ? My point was that in a conversation between Raabe and MK, there was a mention of the SEC suponeaing records. You have stated that the SEC requested your records, so why would Raabe OR MK have brought Pugs into it ? I think Pugs is bringing Pugs into it.. he wasn't feeling important enough IMO . <G>

To: Riley G who wrote (4113)	6/29/1998 8:09:00 PM
From: Due Diligence	Respond to of 6528

New basher expose' Thread. Jimbo exchange2000.com

To: Riley G who wrote (4113)	6/29/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: TopCat	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 6528

>>>Were's TONTO, can't he speak for himself?<<< FWIW, Here's my take on this. IF tonto has been posting on behalf of MK all this time (or part of the time)....that is in very bad form, IMO. IF MK has been posting on tonto's account....that is MUCH WORSE. I believe it is reasonable and acceptable to mask one's identity on SI...(if for no other reason than the rules allow it). To do a head-fake and give people the impression you are one person and actually be another (however hidden by pseudonyms) is not acceptable, IMO. TC