Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PKGP (Packaging Plus) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Donald Skjold who wrote (4713)	6/30/1998 2:21:00 AM
From: slotman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4783

So when you add up a few of those statements about yahoo and aliases, I draw one conclusion. Lakers is roberta and santa too! Think about it for a sec. you might agree. rick in l.a. looking under every rock.

To: Donald Skjold who wrote (4713)	6/30/1998 2:24:00 AM
From: lakers17	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4783

Food for thought.......... If this 70 for 1 reverse split is verified tomorrow, I ask why? Why not a 10 for 1 to weed out the market maker shorters if there were any. Why the BS about us calling in our certificates? My fear is that a short position doesn't exist. If Altomare's plan was for a 70 for 1 to get him to a high per share position to try to get listed on NASDAQ, he has screwed us. Unless a miracle is released tomorrow there is no way this stock without fundamentals will hold it's ground tomorrow. There has to be a lot of buying tomorrow. How many of you are buying shares tomorrow at over $2 a share when people weren't buying new shares at .07? I want to see a company press release from Altomare himself explaining the size of this reverse. Lakers