Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DJBEINO who wrote (35874)	6/30/1998 11:09:00 AM
From: Knighty Tin	Respond to of 53903

DJ, If nobody else has said so, I would like to thank you for all these URLs you post on this thread. Though some are goofus, they do show what people are thinking and many of us would overlook at least some of them. This was a fine article except for the last sentence, which made no sense whatsoever. If everyone is gearing up to produce more 64 Mbit chips, how does that cause a bottom in DRAM prices? The author acts as though the only real DRAM is 16 Mbit DRAM. Nutso. Very similar to what the goof at Loomis Sayles said a couple of years ago. MU would make money because everyone else was getting out of 4 Mbit chips. True, but they were getting out because it was a lousy market and MU didn't make any money, there, either. Sometimes you have to wonder about these reporters. <G> MB