SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry T. who wrote (9702)6/30/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: PartyTime  Respond to of 18444
 
Terry, didn't you get the message that Jon Tara is delivering, on behalf of Zulu, a 50-minute keynote address at a bluechip conference in Chicago in mid-September? Yeah, and he's supposed to address an audience comprised entirely of bluechip clients.

What do you think he's gonna say about Zulu? Do you think he's gonna represent Zulu with honor and distinction? Do you think he'll talk about the pride and joy that Zulu will feel having attained Nasdaq due to its acquisition strategy and leading-edge technology? Do you think either of these two factors are reasons why he'll be delivering the keynote?

Yes, Jon Tara will make us most proud when he delivers his speech to the internet advertising audience that will pay nearly three grand to attend.



To: Terry T. who wrote (9702)6/30/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Respond to of 18444
 
"Trying to glean a balanced report about Zulu from a Doubleclick press release is either incredibly stupid or biased on your part."

You should take this up with Jeffrey, who posted the report, not with me.



To: Terry T. who wrote (9702)6/30/1998 12:08:00 PM
From: Jon Tara  Respond to of 18444
 
Why not simply respond to what I have said about the company, rather than turning it into yet another personal attack?

Attacking me does not change the facts of this report.

You would be better-served by digging further and finding out why Zulu isn't in the report, or if they placed below #10.

Perhaps there is some reason why they weren't included (too new?) but will be in the next one.

Or maybe they are #11, with a bullet.

In my opinion, the true negative thinkers on this thread are those who have to find somebody on the thread to blame for every setback for this stock.

I'm giving you points with which you could strengthen your position. You could do the research. But, instead, you'd rather attack me, which won't do anything for your stock, and won't make you any more knowledgable about it.



To: Terry T. who wrote (9702)6/30/1998 12:12:00 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18444
 
Terry, have you forgotten that there's a Zulu thread-wide boycott of the Tara postings. It is the conclusion among most respected participants on this thread that it makes no sense to directly respond to Tara's absurdities.

It is our hope that, if his postings are left unto themselves and elicit no response, that the Tara absurdities and denials of common sense reality will diminish more and more, and perhaps disappear altogether.

If he doesn't know when the sun is shining or when the sky is blue or when the lakeside mountainous view is beautiful, it's not our fault.

And this does not mean that we don't value constructive criticism. We do.

PS: Terry, I forgot to check. How many penny stocks were on that list of 10? Did you take a count? Also, do institutions invest in penny stocks? How many private, non-publicly trading companies, were on that list of 10?

PPS: All in all, I believe Zulu is doing quite well for a company that is only about a year old and has merged so many different facets into one organization. I'm certain, once Nasdaq status has been attained, that the comparative list of 10 will be viewed differently in next year's future. What do you think?