Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harry J. Finn who wrote (1061)	6/30/1998 5:46:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

If this doesn't sound familiar, it will: "Mr. Pink,I believe credit should be given where credit is due.I had bought shares of CCSI back in November......" exchange2000.com "To: +Chris Pedicini (1691 ) From: +LARRRY Tuesday, Jun 30 1998 4:41PM ET Reply # of 1692 Mr. Pink, I believe credit should be given where credit is due. I had bought shares of CCSI back in November at a little over $10 a share, primarily on recommendations from others. These people put alot of faith in Skipard's recommendations, and they fell for the "story". I went along for awhile and I began having doubts with the "story". I had a real problem with insider selling. I posted my doubts on the CCSI thread in November 97, which was met with denial, sarcasm, shouting, and ridicule. I acquiesced. The stock continued to rise, I was happy but uncomfortable. Then you began posting on the CCSI thread. I initially thought you were a nuisance, as your arguments were often juvenile. But every now and then, you hit a nerve which caused me to reexamine the situation. Short interest continued to grow. More shorts began posting on the CCSI thread. The longs were increasingly basing their positions on hearsay, "the deal". I was becoming more uncomfortable as the expected date for "the deal" was approaching. I began playing devil's advocate with the longs on the CCSI thread, to see if I could find a well thought answer to my doubts. I found none. Again I was met with denial, sarcasm, shouting, and ridicule. I began receiving e-mail from other posters and CCSI thread browsers, questioning my "agenda", it was ridiculous. I decided a 60% return was a good one and sold my shares in early May at 16.5. I have you to thank for reminding me of the flaws that I had seen in CCSI in the past and for pointing out others that I had over looked. Had you not posted your views and lampooned the longs on the CCSI thread as you did, I might have had to go home and explain to the Mrs. where the money went (a fate worse than being locked in the same room with Eddy Blinker). Anyways, thanks Mr. Pink, you are truly a cool dude in my book. Freaky Dude" Just change the names an there you have it.

To: Harry J. Finn who wrote (1061)	6/30/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: Greg Cummings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Mr. Finn, There's NO DOUBT.......On a scale of 1 to 100 (100 being most knowledgeable.....as in Steve, the inventor), Auric's knowledge of AENG may rate a one (1). He attempts to put on this aura of being informed, but as you and I both know, he's a low level pretender. It's likely that Auric (the alias) has many sub aliases that support him in his times of need. It's like giving himself a pep talk. I was able to locate one statement of value in a recent post by Auric and I'm still rejoicing over it. It said something to the effect of......... "Time will tell." This is a highly prophetic statement and I couldn't agree more with it. Here's some real prophesy Auric............Stick around and stay short and this company will crush you and yours. "Time will tell." Bet on it! It's nice to have the "Double 0 Countess by Two" reveal herself, FINALLY! Her identity has been known for a looooong time, but she just wouldn't spill it on her own. I just nudged her a little by using her first name in a couple sentences (without association) and bingo.....she spills the rest. You can't call me unsympathetic. What a Girl! Thanks! The majority of Insurance Representatives/Executives hold multiple licenses, but maybe Charlene's a trainee still hoping for that big day when she makes her first sale. You know, the $5,000 life policy to your mom. Let us know so we can celebrate with you. I'll happily send a, "Congratulations on Your Big Achievement," card. Countess Charlene, Did you know that Auric is holding licenses and is violating the rules of the SEC and the NASD by not revealing them? Are you sure you're not holding any series 6 or 7, etc, licenses? You've been asked, so if you're holding, you're obligated to tell. If so, please tell us which licenses you hold, your full name and your company's name, so we may report you to the proper authorities. Just wondering why you didn't reveal your name earlier? Being the Double 0 Countess who lives to place others in Jill's Jail, you sure were rude in your previous post. Should I contact Jill? Wouldn't it be great to find Charlene sitting in Jill's Jail? Then Auric's cheer would have real value............Haaaareeeee! Double 0 Charlene the Countess by Two, You were the one who was going to publicly post ALL my lies to the BB for review. That was about a month ago. That's funny, not a single lie revealed. Where are they? Do you know why they're tough to find.........cause there ain't any! By the way, how's the Double O AOL connection? I've been watching the "news at 11:00" for a week now. How long should I continue? Auric, while Charlene is busy revealing her licenses, please list your full name, employer and licenses held. No need to give the SEC or NASD's phone numbers in which to file a complaint. I have these! If you don't hold licenses, please deny it here. You too, Charlene! I'd sure hate for the SEC and the NASD to see you guys deny holding licenses, if you're truly holding. Be careful how you answer these questions. I guarantee you, Auric won't answer these questions. Why? Because he'd lose his license to steal John Q. Public's money and would have to make a legitimate living. He can't do that! Hey Auric, are you still holding the OLD short? No matter how you respond, I'll bet it was bought in yesterday. How much did you and yours lose? Were you shorting again today? Can't live without that short position can you? Do you enjoy losing money? Do it Baabee! Haaaareeeee! Best of Luck, Greg PS. The above contains only my opinions.